Phone Numbers

2000ms

262144K

Description:

And where the are the phone numbers?

You are given a string s consisting of lowercase English letters and an integer k. Find the lexicographically smallest string t of length k, such that its set of letters is a subset of the set of letters of s and s is lexicographically smaller than t.

It's guaranteed that the answer exists.

Note that the set of letters is a set, not a multiset. For example, the set of letters of abadaba is {a, b, d}.

String p is lexicographically smaller than string q, if p is a prefix of q, is not equal to q or there exists i, such that p_i < q_i and for all j < i it is satisfied that p_j = q_j. For example, abc is lexicographically smaller than abcd , abd is lexicographically smaller than abec, afa is not lexicographically smaller than ab and a is not lexicographically smaller than a.

Input:

The first line of input contains two space separated integers n and k (1 ≤ n, k ≤ 100 000) — the length of s and the required length of t.

The second line of input contains the string s consisting of n lowercase English letters.

Output:

Output the string t conforming to the requirements above.

It's guaranteed that the answer exists.

Sample Input:

3 3
abc

Sample Output:

aca

Sample Input:

3 2
abc

Sample Output:

ac

Sample Input:

3 3
ayy

Sample Output:

yaa

Sample Input:

2 3
ba

Sample Output:

baa

Note:

In the first example the list of strings t of length 3, such that the set of letters of t is a subset of letters of s is as follows: aaa, aab, aac, aba, abb, abc, aca, acb, .... Among them, those are lexicographically greater than abc: aca, acb, .... Out of those the lexicographically smallest is aca.

Informação

Provedor Codeforces

Código CF940C